Four Mistakes Have Brought Humankind to a Crisis
All four of these Mistakes are grounded in our culture, our way of thinking, our way of seeing the world, the stories we tell ourselves about who we are and why we’re here.
Until he extends his circle of compassion to all living things, man will not himself find peace.
—Albert Schweitzer
In March of 1978 I met a man who for the next thirty years became a major force and role model in my life (I wrote a book about him titled The Prophet’s Way). Gottfried Mueller was, at the time, in his sixties and ran an internationally known famine relief and social work organization headquartered out of Germany. But his personal obsession was the near future, which he saw coming at us like an oncoming train.
We sat in Stadtsteinach, Germany, in the guest house of his organization Salem, and over a glass of organic red wine he put a paper between us on the table and with a pen drew a quick L – a vertical and horizontal line that was each a few inches long.
“Consider human population,” he said, starting to draw from the beginning point. “For a hundred thousand years we were pretty steady.” The line moved a few inches forward, left to right. “Then we started to grow. In 1800 we hit a billion. In 1930 two billion.” The line was starting to curve up. “Three billion in 1960. Four billion in 1974. And they say it’ll be five billion by 1987!” The line curved sharply up toward the top of the page.
“Now,” he said, drawing another L, look at everything else. “Poverty.” An upward line. “Diseases.” Another line shooting up. “Death of the forests and most things living in them.” Another line. “Pollution.” Another upward arc.
He continued through a dozen or so of the ills of humankind, from violence to crime to our consumption of food and water.
“When you see this curve,” he said, “you are in trouble. Each of these must hit a threshold. After the top of that threshold, there is either transformation or disaster, most often disaster. If you and I and others don’t do something about this, we are in trouble. The world is in trouble.”
He was right, and looking back on that March day in the rolling hills of the northern Bavarian Frankenwald forest I realize that, if anything, he was an optimist. He thought it may be a generation, maybe even two, before the crises would be so great that we’d be facing disasters of biblical proportions.
Yet in 2008 over 30 countries had food riots, and in the years since then famine has stalked the globe; today over 18 million people in Sudan are on the edge of starvation, not to mention the crisis in Gaza.
We’re seeing global warming break out of its former boundaries, threatening a planetwide cataclysm if we don’t get our fossil fuel use under control in the next decade.
The world is right now tottering atop three major thresholds: an environment that is so afire it may no longer be able to support human life across much of the planet; an economic “free market” system that is almost entirely owned, run, and milked by a tiny fraction of one percent of us; and an explosion of human flesh on the planet that has turned our species into a global Petri dish just waiting for another infective agent to run amok.
Four mistakes have brought us to this point, and the failure to recognize them at their deepest level, will only push us faster toward total tipping points where we are thrown into disaster. All four of these Mistakes are grounded in our culture, our way of thinking, our way of seeing the world, the stories we tell ourselves about who we are and why we’re here.
The first Mistake is a belief that we’re separate from nature. Our religions tell us we were created by a supernatural being who is not part of this Earth, not from this planet. He set us apart from all other life, and many among us — perhaps even the majority of the six billion of us — don’t even believe that we are animals, but instead think we’re a totally unique life form.
The second Mistake is a belief that an abstraction — an economic system — is divine and separated from us. This mythical so-called “free market,” so we believe, operates under its own divine rules and is entirely and eternally self-regulating. It is always right. The fact that it’s more than 95 percent owned and run by fewer than .0001 percent of us is, by this belief, “just the way things are, always were, and must be.” We are here to serve the economy, this ideology goes; it’s not here to serve us.
The third Mistake is a belief that men should run the world, and that women are their property. While it may seem that women’s rights are well advanced and society is nearly egalitarian in the First World, the US, Western Europe, and Australia combined are only about a quarter of the population of the world. In India it’s still a common rural practice for men to burn their wives to death simply because it’s more convenient than divorce. In many Arab countries and across much of Africa and South America it’s not uncommon for women to be murdered by their families if they “dishonor” the family by not going along with an arranged marriage or not being a virgin. Even in the First World, women are still routinely excluded from positions of power in the world’s largest institutions (like the Catholic Church), and most recently the Supreme Court and every Red state in America have gutted women’s right to control their own bodies.
This is one of our biggest Mistakes, not just because it’s morally deficient or because it can be biologically challenged, but because its primary result is an explosion in population.
The fourth Mistake is a belief that the best way to influence people is through fear rather than through the power of love, compassion, and support. We stand baffled when Palestinians in Gaza vote for a political party that has a long history of terrorist activity, somehow completely overlooking the fact that that same group has been feeding people, building hospitals and schools, and providing old age and widower pensions to people in need. We think we can threaten and bomb people into liking us and behaving in ways that are consistent with our best interests while ignoring theirs. We have come to believe that we are not our brother’s keeper, that we are separate from all other humanity on the planet.
The big questions and the big picture
Civilizations have come and gone, and those long gone mostly vanished because they despoiled their commons, allowed small elites to control their economies and governments, and lived in ways that were unsustainable. Those that survived for centuries or millennia are the ones that learned how to protect their commons, engaged in non-toxic commerce and governance, and organized their culture and lifestyles in ways that could continue in the same place and same way down through the ages.
If we don’t learn the lessons of the latter, we face the fate of the former…
Here are THE answers. They are right here - courtesy of Thom Hartmann.
I absolutely believe these four uncomplicated ideas hold the only plausible alternative to a near certain all-out global devastation we are shepherding ourselves into.
I hope for the sake of Life that Thom's words are read, understood, and acted upon - immediately.
Thom—Nice summary of some of the nuggets of your past writings. It also brings back wonderful memories of trips to Stadtsteinach.
The first mistake that you described might be a bit more nuanced in different traditions. You are right on with the Abrahamic religions but the Eastern traditions approach the uniqueness of humans differently. For example, the blended tradition of Shinto and Buddhism in Japan means that more of the physical environment is seen as sacred and worthy of restraint of human behavior. Buddhism also has a different orientation towards the idea of life as a part of a pattern of the universe. These differences may well play into the difference seen in Japan being willing to allow its population to shrink. How this plays out in China may well be different with the mix of Buddhism (Chan), Confucianism, and the state philosophy of Communism.