Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jon Notabot's avatar

Beautiful, truthful, and imperative. Thank you Thom - the keys to a possibility of "future" are right here in this piece.

Your book "The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight" as well as Daniel Quinn's "Ishmael" hold a quality of wisdom that may just see Life renew...

Expand full comment
Dr. Doug Gilbert's avatar

This is very much in the spirit of social construction and positive psychology. The challenges with those ideas and their associated methods is that they lack scalabilty beyond group dynamics. Once we move beyond the basic groups that surround us, often capped at somewhere in the dozens and not hundreds, we are in the realm of organizational and political ideas.

Taking lessons from the religious writings from the Middle East is not a solution. That was a tribal world with a very low population. Even the much celebrated democracy of Athens was, in the end, a failure.

What the enlightenment brought was the idea of moving beyond tribalism and using the Roman Code model to cover all of political life. The Civil Code systems in Europe and the U.S. Constitutional system are all adaptations of this idea. This presented the potential to move beyond the group setting to a broader political model. Although these systems reflect a grouping of cultural norms, they by no means guarantee sustainability. The Soviet Union used an elaborate civil code model but failed miserably.

The stakes in climate change present a new challenge calling for new ideas of governance. Nations and people who cannot change will be faced with rather dire circumstances as the natural systems of the planet exert their power. Everytime I hear, for example, that the U.S. cannot amend its constitution to change I know the eventual result just not how long it will take to unfold.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts